Justinian helps law-firm teams move from question to defensible memo, redline, chronology, or authority map across cases, statutes, regulations, local rules, and matter files.
Workflow
The work Justinian helps with
Research controlling authority across federal, state, specialty, and local sources.
Compare treatment, circuit splits, state-by-state authority, and procedural posture.
Audit draft briefs, memos, and letters for citation support, negative treatment, and missing authority.
Turn matter files into chronologies, issue maps, source binders, and partner-ready research notes.
Package the reasoning path so senior reviewers can see what was searched, what controlled, and what was rejected.
Agent behavior
What the agent does differently
Plans the research path before drafting, so the answer reflects the jurisdiction, forum, posture, and standard of review.
Follows the citation graph forward and backward instead of treating authorities as isolated search hits.
Connects cases, statutes, regulations, court rules, secondary materials, and uploaded matter documents in one run.
Returns cited artifacts that a lawyer can review, revise, and send through the firm workflow.
Keeps the source passages and reasoning trail visible instead of collapsing the answer into a black-box summary.
Questions teams bring
The recurring asks are already mapped.
What authority controls this issue in this forum right now?
Which cases are still good law, and which ones are vulnerable?
Where does the other side have its strongest support?
What citations in this draft need treatment, replacement, or backup?
Can we turn this matter record into a chronology and issue map for the team?
Source surface
The corpus behind this page
Federal, state, specialty, and local court records
Statutes, regulations, court rules, municipal codes, and agency materials
Citation graph, treatment signals, legal scholarship, and public-law context
Uploaded matter files, research notes, briefs, contracts, policies, and exhibits
More commercial paths